PaK prisoner in Indian jails, SC seeks report within a month

0

DELHI: Supreme Court of India Tuesday directed Union of India to file Status Report on the detention of Pakistani administered Kashmir (PaK) and foreign prisoners detained in the Indian jails.The Court issued this notice on a writ petition filed by Prof Bhim Singh, a local news gatherer CNS said.

Prof Bhim Singh

The petition is against the “illegal, unconstitutional and improper detention / trials” of foreign prisoners by the Government of Jammu and Kashmir for the past over 15 years. Many of the detainees, the petition says, have completed the respective sentences and many of them have been kept in detention under the Public Safety Act without trial.

India was holding around a 1000 prisoners from Pakistan and Pak, according to Singh’s petition. Nearly 700 of them were released by the intervention of the Supreme Court of India which had issued direction to the Union of India and Government of J&K to release all those prisoners from Pakistan, PaK or other countries who had exhausted their respective sentences or who have been detained in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India which commands that no person shall be deprived of his life or liberty without procedure established by law.
The Supreme Court of India by its order dated 03.05.2017 directed, “Union of India had filed Status Report which is in the form of additional affidavit dated 19thApril, 2016. Let this report be updated and a latest report in this behalf be filed before the next date of hearing. State of Jammu and Kashmir may also file a report to the same effect.”

Singh submitted before the Division Bench of the Supreme Court comprising of Justice A.K. Sikri and Justice Ashok Bhushan that State of J&K had filed reply which is incomplete as no details of the proceedings of the prisoners of the Pakistani/PaK has been given nor there is any procedure followed by the Union of India. He said that 15 Pakistanis including some PaK residents have been detained under Public Safety Act (Detention Law) in total violation of Article 21 of Constitution of India.

He submitted before the Supreme Court that most of them have been detained illegally/unconstitutionally and in violation of the Fundamental Rights guaranteed to the foreigners under Article 21 of Indian Constitution as they have been kept in detention, some of them for years, after they had completed their respective detention period.
Singh also made strong protest that there are 23 prisoners (from Pakistan/PaK) who have not been deported in spite of the orders of the Supreme Court of India. Similarly there are three detenus who have been recommended for deportation but are still in prison. There are some 15 prisoners who are undergoing sentences for years without any appeal in the superior courts. The Government also informed the Supreme Court that there were 43 prisoners of Pakistan and PaK who are facing trials and investigation.

Prof Bhim Singh submitted before the Supreme Court to give final chance to the Government of J&K as well as to the Union of India to file their replies so that the matter may be heard by the Supreme Court of India. He has also prayed that the Supreme Court of India shoukd give final opportunity to the Union of India to file its reply.
Singh also said that there were some persons from Nigeria (Hardey Temmy Wesly) and Bangladesh (Naeem Ahmed) whose names were recommended for deportation yet they are still in the Indian jails in defiance of the direction of the Supreme Court.

Prof Bhim Singh expressed regrets that the Government of J&K as well as Union of India have been intentionally and deliberately violating the rule of law that Constitution of India has guaranteed in its Chapter-III on Fundamental Rights and hoped that the respective states (within Union of India) as well as Union of India shall follow the rule of law and direct the Union of India and Govt. of J&K to deport all those foreign prisoners who have been completed more than two years in the Indian jails as under trial.

About Author

Leave A Reply

*